Raju, v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.03.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE W.P.(MD)No.5618 of 2019 Raju ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kumbakonam West Police Station, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

... Respondents (Second respondent is amended vide Court order dated 14.03.2019) PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents or their men, agents from interfering with the peaceful conduct of business i.e., Spa in the name and style of "Family Beauty Spa" at 1st Floor, Door No.21/22, Brammakovil Kadai Veethi, Kumbakonam by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.02.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondents : Mrs.S.Bharathi Government Advocate

ORDER

The petitioner complains that he faces strong interference from the respondents to his peaceful conduct of Spa.

2. The learned Government Advocate submitted that there is no interference with the just activities of the petitioner's Spa.

3. The said statement is recorded. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in the present petition and hence, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar / True Copy / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kumbakonam West Police Station, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

+1 CC to M/s.T.A.EBENEZER, Advocate ( SR-54204[F] dated 15/03/2019 ) W.P.(MD)No.5618 of 2019 ta ES/08.04.2019/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/