Muruganantham, v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. N.SESHASAYEE W.P.[MD].No.5717 of 2019 Muruganantham ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Illupur Sub Division, Pudukkottai District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Illupur Police Station, Illupur, Pudukkottai District.
... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to grant permission and adequate police protection for conducting demonstration near Thasildhar Office, Illuppur, Pudukkottai District on 15.03.2019 based on the petitioner's representation dated 06.03.2019 within a time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondents : Mrs.S.Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
This petition is filed seeking permission of the police to hold demonstration as the petitioner was not satisfied with the investigation of the case in Crime No.33 of 2019 registered for certain offences under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2. Prima facie this Court is not satisfied with the object behind the proposed demonstration. While this Court is aware that the petitioner has fundamental right to free speech and expression and right to conduct demonstration, the cause and the method now proposed to be adopted by the petitioner implies that they are keen to interfere with the statutory agency performing the statutory duty of investigating the offence and apply indirect pressure on the same.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. If at all the petitioner has any grievance that the investigation is not on the right track, there are other legal means to achieve the issue without going to the roads with demonstration. The tool of demonstration must be used for holier purposes and this Court may not be able to appreciate why the petitioner should reject the judicial system of the country as incapable of granting the remedy that he may be interested in. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out the course of remedy as per law for the object that he intends. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AD-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS- ) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Illupur Sub Division, Pudukkottai District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Illupur Police Station, Illupur, Pudukkottai District.
+1 CC to M/s.D.ANBARASU, Advocate ( SR-53713[F] dated 13/03/2019 ) W.P.[MD].No.5717 of 2019 12.03.2019 SP-05.04.2019/2P-5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/