Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/2435/2014dismissed as infructuous

A.Ganesan @ Karuppiah, v. S.V.Lakshmanan,

2018-04-28Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2018 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2435 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 of 2014 and 1 of 2015 A.Ganesan @ Karuppiah :Revision Petitioner/ Appellant/Respondent vs.

S.V.Lakshmanan :Respondent/Respondent Petitioner PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, against the fair and decreetal order passed in R.C.A.No.3 of 2013, dated 27.08.2013, on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal (Sub Court), Pudukottai, confirming the fair and decreetal order passed in R.C.O.P.No.15 of 2010 on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif Court), Pudukottai, dated 04.02.2013. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Chandran For Respondent : Mr.N.Balakrishnan *****

ORDER

The learned Counsel for the respondent has produced before this Court, a memo of compromise, that was filed in O.S.No.154 of 2011, before Lok Adalat.

2.It appears that the parties have entered into a compromise and the revision petitioner, who is one of the parties in the compromise, has agreed to withdraw this civil revision petition. It is stated that possession has been handed over to the respondent pursuant to the compromise.

3.Though the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner sought time earlier to confirm, whether the compromise talks was successful and completed, it is represented by the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner that he is not in a position to confirm the same. Hence, the compromise memo produced by the learned Counsel for the respondent is recorded and the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.In case, the learned Counsel for the petitioner comes to know that the compromise memo was not acted upon, it is open to the petitioner to file a petition to restore the civil revision petition.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(crl side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Rent Controller Appellate Tribunal (Sub Court), Pudukottai.

2. The Rent Controller (District Munsif Court), Pudukottai.

Copy to The Section Officer,(2 copies) Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CMR VB/JC/SAR3/16/05/2018/2P/5C C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2435 of 2014 28.04.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/