Janagam v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.01.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Crl.O.P(MD)No.1439 of 2015 Janagam : Petitioner Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2. The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Post, Vedasanthur Taluk Dindigul District.
: Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to provide police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner by considering her representation dated 12.01.2016.
For Petitioners : Mr.N.Balakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side).
ORDER
The petitioner has come forward with this petition, praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to provide police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner by considering her representation dated 12.01.2016.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the Government Advocate (crl.side) for the State would submit that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, an investigation has been conducted and the same has been closed as mistake of fact.
3. Recording the submission made by the Government Advocate (crl.side), the Criminal Original Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (W) /True Copy/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2. The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Post, Vedasanthur Taluk Dindigul District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+ 1 CC TO M/S.N.BALAKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE IN SR NO.6126/16 MPK TE/GSV-AN/ : 11/02/2016 : 2P/5C ORDER MADE IN Crl.O.P(MD)No.1439 of 2015 29.01.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/