Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.10.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.[MD].No.6790 of 2018 Murugan : Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs.

1.State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thisayanvilai Police Station Tirunelveli District in Crime No.125 of 2018.

:1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Muthuraman :2nd Respondent/ Defacto complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records in CR.No.125 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.T..A.Ebenezer For R-1 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate[Crl. side] For R-2 : Mr.V.Karuna

ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.125 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent police for an alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes(Prevention of Atrocities)Amendment Act, 2015.

2. The case is still in the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.

3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioner and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The parties were also present before the Court and they were identified by Mr.Sankaran, SI of Police and they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card which are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the proceedings in Crime No.125 of 2018.

5. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.125 of 2018, on the file of the first respondent, is quashed and the terms of Joint Compromise Memo shall form part and parcel of this order. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.1000/- as costs, to the credit of the Chief Justice Relief Fund (payable in Accounts Section of the High Court Registry, Madurai Bench), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) Encl: Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo To 1.The Inspector of Police, Thisayanvilai Police Station Tirunelveli District 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Copy To:

The Section Officer, Accounts Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+ 1 CC TO Mr.T..A.Ebenezer, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 88572. aav DS SKN SAR 4 01 11 2018 2P 5C Crl.O.P.[MD].No.6790 of 2018 03.10.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/