← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6216/2019disposed of

T.Mahendran, v. The District Collector,

2019-06-12Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P(MD)No.6216 of 2019 T.Mahendran .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2.The Sub Collector, O/o.the Collectorate Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3.The Tahsildar, O/o.the Tahsildar Office, Palani, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to transfer/accommodate the petitioner at Ayyampuli Village, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District from Sindhalavadampatti Village, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District taking into account of the retirement of the petitioner i.e. on 01.06.2019 and in the light of the recommendation made by the 1st respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 11583/2015/B1 dated 10.01.2018 and by considering the petitioner's representation dated 31.05.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents: Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner made a representation dated 31.05.2018 to the second respondent seeking transfer, based on the recommendation made by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 11583/2015/B1 dated 10.01.2018. Since the same has not been considered so far by the second respondent, the petitioner is before this Court. The learned counsel further requested this Court that it would suffice if the representation of the petitioner is directed to be considered by the second respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the representation of the petitioner will be considered on merits and in accordance with law. 3.Considering the request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 31.05.2018 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar(CS- ) mj To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2.The Sub Collector, O/o.the Collectorate Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3.The Tahsildar, O/o.the Tahsildar Office, Palani, Dindigul District.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-68483[F] dated 13/06/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.AJMAL ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-68658[F] dated 14/06/2019 ) W.P(MD)No.6216 of 2019 12.06.2019 ES/18.06.2019/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/