Raja @ Rajangam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twelfth day of August Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.14619 of 2016 RAJA @ RAJANGAM ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KULITHALAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

(CR.NO. 556 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.V.KARUNA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : Mr.P.KANNITHEVAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who is arrayed as accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.07.2016 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 307 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, in Crime.No.556 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to family dispute, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant with her son and also abused her in filthy language. On complaint, a case has been registered for the above said offences.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 27.07.2016 and prays for enlarging the petitioner on bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the investigation of the case is pending.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai.

(ii)the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 am until further orders.

(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

6.The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate, as to whether the petitioner is complying with the condition or not. sd/- 12/08/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KULITHALAI.

2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KULITHALAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

5. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, SUB JAIL, KULITHALAI, KARUR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.V.KARUNA Advocate SR.No. 44043 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14619 of 2016 TRP Date :12/08/2016 TE/GSV-PM/SAR-III : 12/08/2016 : 2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/