Arun Balaji v. The Inspector General Of Police (Central Zone)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Arun Balaji ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State Rep. by The Inspector General of Police (Central Zone), TVS Tollgate Road, Jamal Mohammed College, Trichy-20.

2.State Rep. by The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy.

3.State Rep. by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirchy City.

4.State Rep. by The Inspector of Police (L&O), City Crime Branch, Trichy District.

5.Thirulogachandar 6.Bharathidhasan, Assistant Commissioner of Police, City Crime Branch, Trichy.

... Respondents 1/4

PRAYER:- Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents 3, 4 and 6 and their officials not to interfere in the business transaction on the basis of the petitioner's representation, dated 25.03.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Shanmugam For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.Manikandan Government Advocate (Crl. side)

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the matter has become infructuous.

2.Recording the above said submission, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

Index : Yes/No 02.02.2024 Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No Sji To 1.The Inspector General of Police (Central Zone), TVS Tollgate Road, Jamal Mohammed College, Trichy-20.

2/4

2.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy.

3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirchy City.

4.The Inspector of Police (L&O), City Crime Branch, Trichy District.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

Sji 02.02.2024 4/4