Farook Abdullah v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1895 of 2017 Farook Abdullah ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

3.Badhrurnisha Begam 4.Nashim Bhanu 5.Mariyam Beevi 6.Nilobar Nisha 7.M.Sameen 8.Jaffer 9.S.Saraswathi Rani

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents to give police protection for the petitioner, his mother and family members and his property. For Petitioner : Mr.J.William Christopher For R1 and R2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R3 to R7 : Mr.Sankar Ganesh

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking police protection to the petitioner and his family members.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondents.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that based on the complaint given by the third respondent, the second respondent police is harassing the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner's mother is the owner of the property in question. By creating false documents, the third respondent sold the property and hence, the petitioner's mother has filed a complaint, based on which a case has been registered and the same is pending. The third respondent also filed civil suit and also obtained an order of injunction. Thereafter, the petitioner had lodged the present complaint. He would further submit that the complaint given by the petitioner has been enquired into by the second respondent police and has been closed as 'civil dispute'.

5. Considering the fact that the complaint given by the petitioner has been enquired and closed by the respondent police, the prayer as such sought for by the petitioner in this petition cannot be granted at this stage. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner has any grievance, it is always open to him to initiate appropriate proceedings to redress the same in the manner known to law. Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.S.JENIFER EVANGELIN VERONICA, Advocate SR-69191. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1895 of 2017 14.06.2019 CS: (08/07/2019) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/