Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/2722/2015dismissed

Dhamodharan v. Neelambal

2018-07-03Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.07.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN C.R.P. (MD).No. 2722 of 2015 and M.P. (MD) No. 1 of 2015

1. Dhamodharan

2. S. Kulothungan ... Petitioners/Proposed LRs of the deceased 8th Respondent Vs.

1. Neelambal

2. Samboornam

3. Vijayalakshmi

...Respondents-1 to 3/Petitioners

4. Seethalakshmi

5. Kunjammal

6. Vembu

7. Dhanapal

8. Jayaraman

9. Kaliyamoorthy

10. Marimuthu Jayalakshmi (died)

11. Yasodhai Ammal

...Respondents-4 to 11/Respondent 1 to 9

12. Ranjitham

...Respondent No.12/Proposed LRs

of the deceased 8th Respondent PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 11.09.2015 in I.A.No.400 of 2015 in A.S.No.7 of 2013 passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur.

For Petitioners : Mr.G. Karnan For Respondents-1 to 10 : Mr.P. Vadivel For Respondent- 11 : Dismissed

O R D E R

The petitioners have come forward with this Civil Revision Petition to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 11.09.2015 in I.A.No.400 of 2015 in A.S.No.7 of 2013 passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur.

2. The petitioners herein are the proposed legal heirs of the deceased 8th respondent and the respondents-1 to 3 are the appellants and the respondents-4 to 11 are the respondents and the respondent no.12 is the proposed legal heirs of the deceased 8th respondent in A.S. No.7 of 2013. During the pendency of the appeal suit in A.S. No.7 of 2013, the appellants have filed a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

interlocutory application in I.A.No.400 of 2015 in A.S.No.7 of 2013 before the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur to implead the petitioners-1 & 2 and the respondent-12 herein, as the legal heirs of the 8th respondent in the appeal and the trial Court has allowed the interlocutory application. Aggrieved over the same, the revision petitioners have come forward with this Civil Revision Petition.

3. The learned counsel who appearing for both the parties submitted that the appeal in A.S.No.7 of 2013 was disposed on 08.02.2018.

4. In view of the above submissions, nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The II Additional District and Sessions Court, Thanjavur.

+1cc to Mr.G. Karnan, Advocate Sr.No.70898 KSA VB/SKN/RSK/SAR4/20.07.2018/2P/3C C.R.P. (MD).No. 2722 of 2015 03.07.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/