← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7099/2018granted

Perumal @ Ilaya Perumal v. The Insepctor Of Police

2018-04-27Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.7099 of 2018 1 PERUMAL @ ILAYA PERUMAL 2 SUNTHARAM @ SUNDHAR ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE TISAYANVILAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.109 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners: M/S.T.A.EBENEZER, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 379 of I.P.C., and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals(Regulation and Development) Act, in Crime No.109 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and that they have not committed any such offence alleged by the respondent and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that there is no previous case registered against the petitioners.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, and executing a bond each of them for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 27/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE TISAYANVILAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.T.A.EBENEZER Advocate SR.No.7667

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7099 of 2018 Date :27/04/2018 MS/CM/GSR/08.05.2018/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/