← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9666/2018disposed of

M.Pandiyan, v. The Regional Airport Authority

2018-07-19Honourable Mr Justice M. Govindaraj2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :19.07.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ W.P(MD)No.9666 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) No.8914 of 2018 M.Pandiyan .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Regional Airport Director, Airport Authority of India, Nungampakkam, Chennai.

2.The Airport Director, Airport Authority of India, Trichy Airport, Trichy - 62007 ... Respondents PRAYER:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents Airport Authority of India, Trichy Airport, Trichy to consider the petitioner's representations dated 12.02.2018 and 21.02.2018 and immediately settle the arrears amount of service tax of the Government of India to the petitioner to be paid to the Commissioner of Customs Trichirappalli in sum of Rs.37,810/- period from 16.06.2005 to 30.11.2006.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajagobal For R2 : Mr.C.Godwin For R1 : No appearance

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents Airport Authority of India, Trichy Airport, Trichy to consider the petitioner's representations dated 12.02.2018 and 21.02.2018 and immediately settle the arrears amount of service tax of the Government of India to the petitioner to be paid to the Commissioner of Customs, Trichirappalli in sum of Rs.37,810/- period from 16.06.2005 to 30.11.2006.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent. There is no representation for the first respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that if a direction is given to the respondents to consider the representations given by the petitioner, the petitioner would be satisfied.

4. Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 12.02.2018 and 21.02.2018 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.(MD) No.8914 of 2018 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(w) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-II) To, 1.The Regional Airport Director, Airport Authority of India, Nungampakkam, Chennai.

2.The Airport Director, Airport Authority of India, Trichy Airport, Trichy - 62007 +2cc to Mr.R.Rajagobal, Advocate Sr.No.73922 +1cc to Mr.C.Godwin, Advocate Sr.No.73897 CM VB/KAK/SAR2/02.08.2018/2P/6C W.P(MD)No.9666 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) No.8914 of 2018 19.07.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/