← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6482/2025disposed of

C. Rajarajeshwari v. The District Collector

2025-03-11Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu,Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.03.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2025 C.Rajarajeshwari ... Petitioner -Vs1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musuri, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

4.The Tahsildar / Taluk Level Monitoring Committee, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

5.Poosari Pratap @ Periyakannan 6.Ramesh ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take appropriate action for removal of encroachment made by the individual at public place at Survey

No.467/97 at Vairichettypalayam Village, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Ms.M.Anbarasi For R1 to R4 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Government Pleader

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.] By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2.It is the grievance of the petitioner that her representation dated 05.09.2024, seeking removal of the encroachment made by the respondents 5 and 6 at public place at Survey No.467/97 situated at Vairichettypalayam Village, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District, is kept pending till date without any progress. Therefore, she has filed this Writ Petition with the aforesaid prayer. 3.Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, learned Government Pleader, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4, submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed on its own merits within a period that may be stipulated by this Court.

4.Notice to the respondents 5 and 6 is dispensed with, since no adverse order is going to be passed as against them.

5.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner either in the representation or in the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition, we direct the official respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.09.2024 after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the private respondents 5 and 6 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. [J.N.B., J.] & [S.S.Y., J.] 11.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Yuva

To 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musuri, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

4.The Tahsildar / Taluk Level Monitoring Committee, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

5.Poosari Pratap @ Periyakulam, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Vairichettypalayam Village, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

6.Ramesh, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Vairichettypalayam Village, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

J.NISHA BANU, J.

AND S.SRIMATHY , J.

Yuva W.P.(MD)No.6482 of 2025 11.03.2025