Arunkumar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24/03/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN Arunkumar ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs The Inspector of Police, Aranthangi Police Station, Pudukottai District, (Crime No. 184 of 2020). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. S.Sathyachidambaram, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 184 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 506(ii) of IPC seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Heard both sides.
3. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity the petitioner herein along with others have attacked the defacto complainant with wooden log and threatened him with dire consequences.
4. The learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) appearing for
the State would submit that the injured person sustained only simple injuries.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured person sustained only simple injuries, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; (c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the condition have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 24/03/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARANTHANGI, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.
2. DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARANTHANGI POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1.CC to M/S.S.SATHYACHIDAMBARAM, Advocate (SR.No.5707(I) dated 24/03/2020)
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.5128 of 2020 Date :24/03/2020 AAV SRS/ VR/ SAR-II/ 07.05.2020/ 3P/6C