Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15522/2016disposed of

Rathika, W/O.Jeyakumar, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2016-08-24Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.08.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15522 of 2016 Rathika .. Petitioner/ Defacto complainant Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Keelavalavu Police Station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.215 of 2016) .. Respondents/ Complainants PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to monitor the investigation to be conducted by the third respondent in Crime No.215 of 2016 and consequently direct the third respondent to file a final report with appropriate sections. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Anandan For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to monitor the investigation to be conducted by the third respondent in Crime No.215 of 2016 and to consequently direct the third respondent to file a final report with appropriate sections.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the offence made out, as per the complaint, is under Sections 324, 326, 307 and 506(ii) IPC, the case has been registered in Crime No.215 of 2016 only under Sections 294(b) 323 and 506(ii) IPC by the third respondent and that unless some superior officers monitor the investigation, the investigation will not go on proper way. Hence, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

4.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the third respondent Police is taking earnest efforts in this case and that the fair investigation is going on.

5.Having regard to the lacuna pointed out by the petitioner, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurai District is directed to monitor the investigation being conducted by the third respondent in Crime No.215 of 2016 and ensure the filing of final report by the third respondent forthwith.

6.This Criminal Original Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur, Madurai District.

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurai District 4.The Inspector of Police, Keelavalavu Police Station, Madurai District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+One cc to M/s.B.Anandan, Advocate, SR.No.46823 gcg RL/7C/2P/SS3/15/9/2016 Crl.O.P(MD)No.15522 of 2016 24.08.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/