← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7163/2018granted

Ramesh v. The Insepctor Of Police

2018-04-27Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand and Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.7163 of 2018 RAMESH ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.7 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, SANARPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

IN CR. NO. 106/2018.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.BALAKARTHICK Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as Accused No.7. He was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.02.2018 for the offences under Sections 147, 148,149 and 302 of I.P.C., in Crime No.106 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police. He seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for bail in favour of the petitioner.

3.The learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) submitted that accused No.5 has already been granted bail and he further submitted that the petitioner is not having any previous case. 4.Taking note of all these aspects, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions;

(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(ii) the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. (iii) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 27/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, DINDIGUL.

2 DO THOUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.

4 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE SANARPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.BALAKARTHICK Advocate SR.No.7597.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7163 of 2018 Date :27/04/2018 MKV/VR/VK/27.04.2018/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/