Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirteenth day of March Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.2325 of 2017 1 MURUGAN 2 SUDALI @ SUDALAIMANI 3 PITCHAMMAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1,2&4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAYATHAR POLICE STATION, KAYATHAR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT (CRIME NO. 60/2017) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.VEILMUTHU Advocate For Respondent : S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A-1, A-2 and A-4 in Crime No.

60 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 353, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 5 of TNPPDL Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent on instructions submitted that the petitioners along with other accused said to have damaged the jeep glass and A-3 was arrested and released on bail.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a week ie., every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders and the petitioners 2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 13/03/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II KOVILPATTI 2.-DO-THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAYATHAR POLICE STATION, KAYATHAR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.K.VEILMUTHU Advocate SR.No.14126

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2325 of 2017 Date :13/03/2017 MAS/RR/SAR3:16.03.2017:2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/