Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15716/2016disposed of

A.Chinnamma Naidu v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-08-26Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.08.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P(MD)No.15716 of 2016 A.Chinnamma Naidu .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, Dindigul.

3.Rengappan 4.Murugan.

.. Respondents PRAYER:Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to grant police protection for the petitioner's 'life and limb' as well as for his property in Survey No.723/1B in Ayyalur Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District, based on the representation, dated 23.05.2016.

For Petitioner :Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani for R1 and R2 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to grant police protection for the petitioner's 'life and limb' as well as for his property in Survey No.723/1B in Ayyalur Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District, based on the representation, dated 23.05.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents 1 and 2.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has obtained a decree dated 04.04.2008 in O.S.No.221 of 2000 before the learned District Musnif, Vedasandur, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

which is for declaration and permanent injunction. Under such circumstances, it is alleged that the respondents 3 and 4 with the help of some henchmen attempted to prevent the petitioner from gaining access to the suit schedule property, being the subject mater of the suit in O.S.No.221 of 2000, which is already decreed in favour of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner, submitted a detailed representation, dated 23.05.2016, to the first respondent seeking for the relief stated above. Since the same is not considered so far, the petitioner is before this Court.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that CSR is pending and it is agreeable for them to consider the representations dated 23.05.2016.

5. Under such circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 23.05.2016 and thereafter, pass orders on merits and in accordance with law.

6. With the above direction, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar jikr To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vadamadurai Police Station, Dindigul.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1CC to Mr.M.P.Senthil, Advocate Sr.No.47541 GJM/GSV/PM/12.9.16-2p-5c Crl.O.P(MD)No.15716 of 2016 26.08.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/