Arasu @ Deepak v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourteenth day of March Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.M.BASHEER AHAMED CRL OP(MD) No.2510 of 2017 ARASU @ DEEPAK ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED A1 Vs THE STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.S.COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI, CRIME NO.118/2017 ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S.R.MURUGAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Section 147, 148,341, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC., in Crime No.

118 of 2017, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on instructions from the respondent submitted that the petitioner along with the other accused moved anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1689 of 2017 before this Court and that petition was dismissed in respect of the petitioner concerned after considering the overtact of the petitioner by attacking the defacto complainant with stick on the head of the defacto complainant and caused blood injuries. The injured was discharged from the hospital, but the medical report and wound certificate was not received so far. Investigation is pending. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

He further submitted that the petitioner is having no previous case and there is no serious allegation on the petitioner herein.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that there is no change of circumstances after dismissal of the earlier anticipatory bail application in respect of the petitioner and the specific overtact of the petitioner and also the fact that the medical report is not yet received and investigation is still pending, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this stage. Hence this petition is dismissed.

sd/- 14/03/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.S.COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

PJL PSM/PM-PN/SAR3/20.03.2017/2P/3C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2510 of 2017 Date :14/03/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/