Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8334/2019dismissed

Jenifer,W/O.Peer Mohamedussain v. The Commissioner Of Police

2019-04-16Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.04.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.(MD)No.8334 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD).No.6529 of 2019 Jenifer ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, O/o. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station, Madurai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thideer Nagar Police Station, Madurai.

4.Peer Mohamed Ussain 5.Syed Sheik Mydeen 6.Sulthan Alaudeen ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, by directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the lives and limbs of the petitioner and her minor daughter namely A1 shafa by considering her representation dated 03.04.2019.

For Petitioner :Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mrs.S.Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For Respondents 4 to 6 :Mr.C.M.Arumugam

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and her minor daughter namely A1 shafa by considering her representation dated 03.04.2019.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.The petitioner is wife of the fourth respondent. There was a matrimonial dispute between them in which the petitioner's

brother filed a complaint against the fourth respondent for an offence under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC which was registered in Crime No.5 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police. Similarly, the fourth respondent has also filed a complaint against the petitioner's brother for an offence under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.4 of 2019. Both the cases are pending before the respondent police and another CSR pending before the third respondent. Hence, the petitioner filed this petition with the above said prayer.

3.The learned counsel for the respondents 4 to 6 would submit that the allegations made against the respondents 4 to 6 are imaginary one and they will not disturb the petitioner and her daughter.

4.Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents 4 to 6, this petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected W.M.P.(MD).No.6529 of 2019 is also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (ADI) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Commissioner of Police, O/o. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station, Madurai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thideer Nagar Police Station, Madurai.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

VSG W.P.(MD)No.8334 of 2019 16.04.2019 KM/(10.05.2019) 3P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/