← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6211/2025dismissed

Rajeshkumar v. The Bar Council Of Tamil Nadu And Puducherry

2025-03-07Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu,Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.03.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No.6211 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.4551, 4552 and 4555 of 2025 Rajeshkumar ... Petitioner -Vs1.The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, Chennai.

2.The Election Committee, Melur Bar Association, Court Complex, Melur, Madurai District.

3.The Bar Association of Melur, Rep. by its President, Melur, Maduari District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned election notification dated 27.02.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent and voters list published by the 2nd respondent on 03.03.2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to conduct

election to the Melur Bar Association by preparing the fresh voter list in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu (Constitution and Registration) Rules.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Alagusundar For R1 : Mr.K.R.Laxman For R2 : Mr.M.Abdul Rashith For R3 : Mr.S.MP.Amalan

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.] By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2.A perusal of the affidavit would show that the petitioner is an Advocate by profession. He has filed this Writ Petition as Public Interest Litigation, challenging the election notification dated 27.02.2025 and the voters list published by the 2nd respondent dated 03.03.2025. It is purely private dispute between the petitioner and Melur Bar Association. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the process of conducting election, he has to approach only the competent civil forum. Therefore, this Writ Petition cannot be termed as Public Interest

Litigation. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [J.N.B., J.] & [S.S.Y., J.] 07.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Yuva

J.NISHA BANU, J.

AND S.SRIMATHY , J.

Yuva W.P.(MD)No.6211 of 2025 07.03.2025