← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8526/2019disposed of

R.Dora, W/O.Late. A.Rajamoni, v. The Tamil Nadu State

2019-04-10Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.8526 of 2019 R.Dora ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Represented by its General Manager, (Madurai) Ltd., Nagercoil.

2.The Accountant General A&E, 361, Anna Salai, Chennai - 18, Tamilnadu.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to settle petitioner's husbands family pension and other pension benefits with adequate interest with revised scale of pension.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Cenil For Respondents : Mr.K.Sathyasingh for R1 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran for R2

ORDER

The Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to settle the petitioner's husband's family pension and other pensionary benefits with interest in the revised scale of pay.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the first respondent and the learned Counsel, who takes notice for the second respondent. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3. The case of the petitioner is that her husband worked in the first respondent and retired from service. Thereafter, he died on 10.06.2010. The grievance of the petitioner is that her husband's pensionary benefits were not settled by the first respondent. Hence, the petitioner made a representation to the first respondent on 29.05.2017. However, the same has not been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

considered so far. Therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing this Writ Petition.

4. The learned Counsel appearing for the first respondent submitted that the representation of the petitioner would be considered by the first respondent on merits, within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

5. Considering the nature of the relief sought for by the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.05.2017 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T & P) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ssl To 1.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Madurai) Ltd., Nagercoil.

2.The Accountant General A&E, 361, Anna Salai, Chennai - 18, Tamilnadu.

+1CC TO MR.G.CENIL, Advocate Sr. No.60495 +1CC TO MR.K.SATHIYA SINGH, Advocate Sr. No.60297 +1CC TO MR.P.GUNASEKARAN, Advocate Sr. No.60688 W.P(MD)No.8526 of 2019 10.04.2019 TR (27.04.2019) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/