R.Bhuvaneshwari, v. The Commissioner Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.05.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR H.C.P(MD)No.631 of 2018 R.Bhuvaneshwari .. Petitioner Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Kumbakonam West Police Station, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
4.Rajasekar .. Respondents Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the second and third respondents herein to produce the body or person of the detenue by name Yogalakshmi, D/o.Rajendran aged about 18 years, who has been illegally detained by the fourth respondent and produce her before this Court and set her at liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar For RR 1 to 3 : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan, Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.,) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the petitioner to produce the detenue, who claims to be her daughter. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. According to the petitioner, she is the mother of the detenue, Yogalakshmi, aged about 18 years. On 08.04.2018, due to the petitioner's heart ailment, she had taken sleeping pills and went for sleep. When the petitioner woke up, to her shock and surprise, she found that the detenue was missing and she was unable to trace the detenue. Therefore, the petitioner lodged a complaint before the second respondent Police in this regard. Since no effective steps were taken by the respondent Police to trace out the detenue, the petitioner has come up with the present Habeas Corpus Petition.
3. Today, when the Habeas Corpus Petition was taken up for consideration, the respondent Police produced the detenue. When we questioned the detenue, she has stated that on her own will and volition, she went along with one Rajesekar/ fourth respondent and married him on 02.05.2018. She has further stated that she is not in illegal custody and she also expressed her willingness to go along with her husband (i.e.,) the fourth respondent herein.
4. In view of the above, since the detenue is not in illegal custody and also as she is a major as of today, in our considered view, nothing survives for adjudication in the Habeas Corpus Petition. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To
1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Kumbakonam West Police Station, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
Sts/rm AE/SB/SAR3/18.06.2018/2P/4C Order in H.C.P(MD)No.631 of 2018 23.05.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/