Vennila v. The Superintendnet Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16130 of 2016 1.Vennila 2.Thavamani 3.Ulagammai .. Petitioners Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District 2.State represented by Inspector of Police, Madhagupatti Police Station, Sivagangai District .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute in any manner.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balamuruganantham For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is a petition seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute in any manner.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) as well as the learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the dispute has already been settled before the Lok Adalat. Therefore, there is no opportunity for the respondents to interfere with the civil https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dispute.

4. In view of the submission made by the counsel on either side, this petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CSI) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District

2. The Inspector of Police, Madhagupatti Police Station, Sivagangai District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+One cc to Mr.R.Balamuruganantham, Advocate, SR.No.48645 RR RL/5C/2P/SKS/RR/16/9/2016 Crl.O.P(MD)No.16130 of 2016 31/08/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/