Arumugam v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirty First day of August Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.16213 of 2016 1 ARUMUGAM 2 KARPAGAM ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2&3 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUPPUVANAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
(CRIME No.406 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONERS : M/S.A.R.KANNAPPAN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : Mr.P.KANNITHEVAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b),323,324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.406 of 2016, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod and threatened him with dire consequences. On complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioners for the above said offences.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that this is the case and counter case and it is a simple injury and the investigation of the case is pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that it is a simple injury, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioners are being ladies shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. 6.The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate, as to whether the petitioners are complying with the condition or not.
Sd/- 31/08/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI.
2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUPPUVANAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.A.R.KANNAPPAN Advocate SR.No. 48628 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16213 of 2016 TRP Date :31/08/2016 TE/GSV-PM/SAR-III : 02/09/2016 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/