Sundaresan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the First day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.16300 of 2016 1 SUNDARESAN 2 N.S.SUDALAIYANDY 3 GOMATHI ... PETITIONERS Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AMBASAMUTHIRAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S.R.VINOTH BHARATHI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.Kannithevan, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A) IPC and Sections 4 and 5 of Dowry Prohibition Act and 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.not known of 2016 on the file of respondent police and seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, petition enquiry has been conducted and closed. 3.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 01/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AMBASAMUTHIRAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.VINOTH BHARATHI Advocate SR.No.50187 JAM/SS 2/6.09.16/SAR I /2P-4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16300 of 2016 Date :01/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/