Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16453/2016disposed of

K. Selvi v. The Superintendnet Of Police

2016-09-01Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16453 of 2016 K.Selvi .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palani Sub Division, Palani, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Chatrapatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

4.Ramasamy 5.Sivakumar 6.Bombay Ramasamy .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1 to 3 respondents to provide adequate Police protection to the petitioner and his family members to protect their life and limb from the respondents 4 to 6 and their associates on the basis of the representation given by the petitioner on 25.08.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Shoba Evangeline Veronic For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, 1 to 3 Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the official respondents to give necessary police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner on the basis of her representation dated 25.08.2016.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents 1 to 3. By

consent, the Criminal Original Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. In view of the limited relief sought for, notice to the respondents 4 to 6 is dispensed with.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner already succeeded in the Civil Court and the respondents 4 to 6 also filed appeal suit against that judgment, they illegally trespassed into her property and attacked her son, for which a case has also been registered in Crime No.187 of 2016 under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC; even after registration of the case, they again created problems; hence, apprehending danger, she had sent a representation dated 25.08.2016 to the respondents seeking necessary Police protection; and as there was no response to the same, she has come up with this petition.

4.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents, on instructions, would submit that the third respondent would consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.08.2016 and pass appropriate orders on merits. 5.In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 25.08.2016 and after hearing the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 6, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law forthwith. Sd/- Assistant Registrar () /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar gcg To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palani Sub Division, Palani, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Chatrapatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 cc to Mr.V.SHOBA EVANGELINE ,Advocate, Sr.No: 50135 JAM/SKS-RR/23.09.16/ 2P-6C Crl.O.P(MD)No.16453 of 2016 01.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/