← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4052/2024granted

Mariammal v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-03-14Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 14/03/2024 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI Mariammal ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The Inspector of Police, Manur Police Station, Manur, Tirunelveli District.

In Crime No.162 of 2024.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Pragalathan,Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.162 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.03.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 6, 24(1) of the Cigarette and 1/6

Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 and Section 77 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, in Crime No.162 of 2024, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of tobacco products and the same was seized by the respondent Police. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not commit any offences as alleged by the prosecution and he was falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 02.03.2024. Further, the earlier bail petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the concerned Court. However, on instructions, he would further submit that the petitioner, without prejudice to his rights, is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- to the Nithiyakalyani-Vellaiyan Chettiyar Government Higher Secondary School, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District, for making toilet facility or providing other facilities to the students. Hence, he prays for grant bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that no previous case is pending against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

2/6

5.Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no previous case is pending against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Tirunelvei, Tirunelveli District, and on further conditions that:

(a)as per the undertaking given by the petitioner, the petitioner shall make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) to the Nithiyakalyani-Vellaiyan Chettiyar Government Higher Secondary School, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgment before the trial Court while executing the sureties; Thereafter, the Headmaster of the School shall spend the amount for the welfare of the students and file necessary proof before the learned Magistrate;

3/6

(b) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c) the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m, until further orders;

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; 4/6

(g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 14/03/2024 / TRUE COPY / 14/03/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

INDU TO THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANUR POLICE STATION, MANUR,TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

THE OFFICER INCHARGE SPECIAL WOMEN SUB-JAIL, KOKKIRAKULAM, TIRUNELVELI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

5/6

COPY TO THE HEADMASTER NITHIYAKALYANI - VELLAIYAN CHETTIYAR GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, RADHAPURAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

+1 CC to M/s.N.PRAGALATHAN, Advocate ( SR-3212[I] dated 14/03/2024 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4052 of 2024 Date :14/03/2024 PKP/14.03.2024/ 6P/8C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 6/6