← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/936/2019dismissed

Pandiyammal, v. The District Collector

2019-03-01Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.936 of 2019 Pandiyammal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Tahsildar, Head Quarters, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

3.Sathesh 4.Alagi ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent vide his proceedings in O.Mu.No.B6/3612/2018 dated 16.04.2018 and consequential impugned order passed by the second respondent vide his proceedings in O.Mu.(P6)11286/2018, dated 29.11.2018 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the second respondent to issue the legal heir certificate to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.Khan K.S.M.S.Ibrahim For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Karuppasamy Government Advocate For R3 & R4 : Mr.P.Balan

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The issue relates to issuance of legal heir certificate following the demise of one Pichai on 06.09.2017. It is not in dispute that the said Pichai had more than one wife. His first marriage was not dissolved in the manner known to law. She is said to have eloped with somebody else. The writ petitioner is the second wife of the said Pichai. The writ petitioner also had earlier contracted another marriage. It appears that even those marriages were not dissolved in the manner known to law. The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chennai has issued a circular to the effect that if the deceased is having more than one https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

wife, the claimants should be advised to approach the Civil Court for getting relief. In such a case, the second respondent cannot be mandated to issue any legal heir certificate.

3. I am therefore unable to grant any relief to the writ petitioner. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. It is made clear that the the dismissal of this writ petition will not come in the way of the children born to Pichai from moving the Civil Court for getting declaration that they are the legal heirs of the Pichai.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl Side) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Building, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Tahsildar, Head Quarters, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

+1 CC to M/s.S.KHAN K.S.M.S.IBRAHIM, Advocate ( SR-51216[F] dated 04/03/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-51518[F] dated 04/03/2019 ) W.P.(MD)No.936 of 2019 01.03.2019 rmk KK/SAR-/29.03.2019/2P-5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/