M.Jeya v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.04.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.9562 of 2019 M.Jeya ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, Anna Maligai, Madurai Corporation, Tallakulam, Madurai-625 010.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Zone I, Madurai.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.12.2018 within a time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.M.Shamugaselvam

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The petitioner had put up a construction in the plot bearing No.22-A, Bye Pass Road, Ponni Nagar, Kalavasal, Madurai. According to the petitioner, it is an approved construction. But then the respondents are levying penalty on the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner has given a representation dated 13.12.2018 in this regard.

3.The first respondent is directed to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter. It is further reiterated that this Court has not given any positive direction to the first respondent to pass orders one way or the other.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) +1 CC to M/s.N.SHANMUGA SELVAM, Advocate ( SR-61559[F] dated 22/04/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.C.M.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-61705[F] dated 23/04/2019 W.P.(MD)No.9562 of 2019 CS:13/05/2019/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/