Sahul Hameed v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Third day of March Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.3384 of 2017 1 SAHUL HAMEED 2 ARIYA BANU 3 SAHUL @ SAHUL HAMEED 4 SABIDEEN 5 CHINNA POTTU @ SAMSATH BEGAM 6 ABDUL RAZAK ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 TO 7 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PALANI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CRIME NO.3 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos. 2 to 7 in Crime No.03 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 313, 109, 294(b) and 506 (i) of IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State. 3.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the wife of A1and that the petitioners are the relatives of the defacto complainant and they harassed the defacto complainant by demanding dowry.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent on instructions submitted that there are totally seven

accused in this case. The petitioners are A-2 to A-7. A1 was arres on 20.03.2017. The petitioners 2 and 3 are father-in-law and motherin-law and A4 to A7 are relatives of the defacto complainant. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that it is a family dispute, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required, for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 23/03/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,PALANI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate SR.No.17889 RJ2 CSL/CM-MSA/SAR-II/28.03.2017 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3384 of 2017 Date :23/03/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/