Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16788/2016closed

R.Stalin v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-09-08Honourable Mr Justice C. T. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.16788 of 2016 1 R.STALIN 2 R.RAMAR 3 R.JOTHI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, USILAMPATTI TALUK POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.NIRANJAN .S.KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioners pray for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for offences punishable under Sections 359,363,323,324 and 506(i) of IPC on the file of the respondent police.

2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that petition enquiry is pending. However, he submits that on conclusion of the enquiry, there is possibility of registering the case for cognizable offences.

3. The apprehension of the petitioners is well founded. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial

Magistrate No.II, Usilampatti, Madurai District within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, (i) the petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond in a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties for the like sum to their satisfaction; (ii)the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(iii)the petitioners 1 and 2 shall be available for interrogation by the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m for one week and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation and the 3rd petitioner being lady shall available for interrogation as and when required.

sd/- 08/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, USILAMPATTI,MADURAI DISTRICT.

2 DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, USILAMPATTI TALUK POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.NIRANJAN .S.KUMAR Advocate SR.No.51031

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16788 of 2016 Date :08/09/2016 PA/SK-SKN/SAR I/15.09.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/