Arivalagan .M v. The District Collector
W.P(MD)No. 6592 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P(MD)No. 6592 of 2022 and WMP(MD) No.5098 of 2022 M.Arivalagan .. Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.
2.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Tiruchirappalli District.
3. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC), Thuvakudi, Tiruchirappalli District.
.. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2022 and consequently forbearing the respondents from establishing the wine shop in Survey Nos.98/3 and 98/4A, situated at Muthiyampalayam Village, Thuraiyur Taluk near the Girivalam pathway of Sri Arulmigu Prasanna Venkatachalapathy Temple, Perumalmalai Foothill, Thuraiyur Taluk, Thiruchirappalli District. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi For Respondents : Mr.M.Sidharthan Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2
ORDER
[Made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.] 1.
This petition is styled as public interest litigation. The petitioner is a lawyer. The prayer clause in the writ petition reads as under:- "For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P(MD)No. 6592 of 2022 order or direction in the nature of writ, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2022 and consequently forbearing the respondents from establishing the wine shop in Survey Nos.98/3 and 98/4A, situated at Muthiyampalayam Village, Thuraiyur Taluk near the Girivalam pathway of Sri Arulmigu Prasanna Venkatachalapathy Temple, Perumalmalai Foothill, Thuraiyur Taluk, Thiruchirappalli District."
2. Firstly the petition is on some apprehension, that too in the form of public interest litigation, that too by a practising lawyer.
3. We are not inclined to entertain this petition. This petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition would not survive.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /TRUE COPY/ / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.
2.The Tahsildar, Thuraiyur, Tiruchirappalli District.
3. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, (TASMAC), Thuvakudi, Tiruchirappalli District.
+1 CC to M/s.D. SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI, Advocate ( SR-18008[F] dated 12/04/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP. ( SR-18157[F] dated 12/04/2022 ) W.P(MD)No. 6592 of 2022 11.04.2022 MK/21.04.2022/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2