← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6281/2020disposed of

G.Veerabahu v. The Secretary

2021-06-03Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.6281 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU W.P.(MD)No.6281 of 2020 and W.M.P(MD)No.5500 of 2020 G.Veerabahu ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.The Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi - 110001.

2.The Board of Governors of Indian Institute of Management Tiruchirappalli, Represented by its Director, Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Director, Indian Institute of Management Trichirappalli, Tiruchirappalli.

4.Mr.N.Baskaran, Manager, Executive Education and Consulting, Indian Institute of Management Trichirappalli, Tiruchirappalli.

...

Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the third respondent against the petitioner vide letter dated 09.04.2020 and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar For R-1 : Mr.S.Jeyasingh For R-2 : Mr.Raguvaran Gopalan For R-3 & R-4 : No Appearance

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the third respondent against the petitioner vide letter dated 09.04.2020 and quash the same as illegal.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.6281 of 2020

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that this writ petition has been filed challenging the termination order passed by the third respondent and subsequently, by invoking the appeal provisions, the petitioner has filed an appeal before the second respondent and the same is pending and therefore, it would be suffice, if a direction is issued to the second respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner, within a time frame.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed with a direction to the second respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, by affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (ADII) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To The Director, Board of Governors of Indian Institute of Management Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli.

+1 CC to M/s.NIRANJAN S. KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-18777[F] dated 04/06/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.S.JEYASINGH, Advocate ( SR-18891[F] dated 07/06/2021 ) W.P.(MD)No.6281 of 2020 03.06.2021 KB(16.06.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2