Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16916/2016dismissed

M.Vijayakrishnan v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-11-25Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of November Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.16916 of 2016 M.VIJAYAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.6 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIVANTHIPATTI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CRIME NO.83 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 419, 420 and 120(b) IPC in Crime No.83 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner/A6 has come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that this petitioner along with other accused is alleged to have fabricated the RDO letter dated 31.08.2015 as if a direction was issued to the Tahsildar to issue patta to him, which resulted in registration of the case.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution.

5. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that one Loganathan applied for patta to the RDO, which was rejected on the ground that the land for which patta was applied belongs to some other person and the said letter of rejection was forged by the petitioner along with other accused and the investigation of the case is pending.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. Taking note of the serious nature of the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 25/11/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.2) TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIVANTHIPATTI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16916 of 2016 Date :25/11/2016 anr/ck/sar2/20.12.2016/2p/3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/