Robin@Robinson v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Seventh day of March Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.3556 of 2017 1 ROBIN@ROBINSON 2 RANI 3 STALIN ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOODANKULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CRIME NO.36 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.L.GEORGE PAUL ANTO Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A-1 to A-3, in Crime No.36 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 174 Cr.P.C @ 306 of I.P.C and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased and A-1 are husband and wife. Since there was no issues, the petitioners are said to have harassed the deceased and it is the further allegation that the A-1 is said to have had illicit intimacy with another lady. Due to the said torture, she committed suicide.
4. learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) on instructions submitted that the case of suicide was altered into the case of 306 of I.P.C
5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the deceased has been living separately and not in her husband's/A-1's house and the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6. Considering the above said facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.
, until further orders and the second petitioner being a lady, she shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation and the third petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a week ie., on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 27/03/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALLIYOOR.
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOODANKULAM POLICE STATION,TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.L.GEORGE PAUL ANTO Advocate SR.No.18064
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.3556 of 2017 Date :27/03/2017 MS/KKR/SAR.4/03.04.2017/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/