Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16946/2016allowed

M.Sivaraman v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-09-09Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.09.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.16946 of 2016 1.M.Sivaraman 2.Siva 3.Sathishkumar ... Petitioners/A1 to A3 -vs1.

The State Represented by its The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi South Police Station, Thoothukudi (Crime No.977/2016) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.

Murugesh ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in relating to the FIR in Crime No.977 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioners :

Mr.S.R.Durairaj For R1 :

Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate For R2 :

Mr.A.Karthick ******

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the case registered in Crime No.977 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police, pursuant to the amicable settlement effected between the parties.

2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.977 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(Ii) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / A1 to A3.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in person and their identifications were also verified by this Court. Learned counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify of their respective parties.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned counsel appearing on either side filed a joint memo of compromise dated 02.09.2016, duly stating that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement by way of compromise among themselves, the second respondent has agreed to quash the above case in Crime No.977 of 2016 pending on the file of the first respondent.

5. Considering the nature of allegations and in view of joint memo of compromise dated 02.09.2016, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending. Therefore, the entire proceedings in Crime No.977 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent in respect of the petitioners/accused alone, are hereby quashed.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties. The joint compromise memo dated 02.09.2016 shall form part of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To:

(*)JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO XEROX COPEIS ARE ENCLOSED HEREWITH 1.

The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi South Police Station, Thoothukudi 2.

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+One cc to Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthick, Advocate, SR.No.51393 CM RL/4C/2P/SKS/RR/21/9/2016 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16946 of 2016 09.09.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/