Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/3606/2017closed

Hameetha Begum v. The Superintendent Of Police

2017-03-28Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.03.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.(MD) No.3606 of 2017 Hameetha Begum : Petitioner -vs1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District 2.The Inspector of Police Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.Mani : Respondents Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the respondents Nos.1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner for renovate her house by considering the petitioner representation dated 18.01.2017.

For Petitioners :

Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents :

Mr.A.P.Balasubramani for R1 & R2 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

It is the case of the petitioner that she wants to renovate her house, which has been objected to and obstructed by the third respondent. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation dated 18.01.2017 and has filed this petition for police protection.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

3.The learned Government Advocate submitted that on the complaint given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted, in which, the petitioner and the third respondent have been called for enquiry. During the enquiry, the third respondent has given an undertaking that he will not unnecessarily cause https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

disturbance to the petitioner and that he will settle all dispute before the civil Court. Recording the submission of the petitioner and the third respondent, the police have closed the enquiry on 12.01.2017. In the closure report, it is clearly stated that the police have cautioned the third respondent not to cause unnecessary hindrance and disturbance to the petitioner herein. Recording the same, this petition is closed with a further direction to the police to ensure that no harm be falls the petitioner from the third respondent. A copy of the closure report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

RR JS/MR/SAR.2/11.04.2017/2P-4C Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.3606 of 2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/