← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17037/2016disposed of

R.R.Rajini v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-09-12Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD).No.17037 of 2016 R.R. Rajini ..Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendant of Police, Kanyakumari District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Arumanai Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3. Joseph, The Sub Inspector of Police, Arumanai Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner and the family members by interfering into the civil dispute without following due process of law and to take action against them on the basis of the petitioner's representation made before the first respondent herein dated 03.09.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.B. Brijesh Kishore For respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasn Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner and the family members by interfering into the civil dispute without following due process of law and to take action against them, on the basis of the petitioner's representation made before the first respondent herein dated 03.09.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to civil dispute, the 3rd respondent is compelling the petitioner to settle the same with the defacto complainant and he has frequently called the petitioner to the Police Station and harassed him under the guise of enquiry.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that after issuing notice, the petitioner was called for enquiry in respect of a petition pending against him and not to decide the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

civil rights of the parties in the Police Station and that the respondent Police did not cause any harassment to the petitioner. However, he gave an undertaking that if at all the presence of the petitioner is required, the respondent would call the petitioner for enquiry only after issuing summons giving specific date, time and place.

5.Recording the above undertaking given by the learned Government Advocate, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai-23.

To

1. The Superintendant of Police, Kanyakumari District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Arumanai Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3. Joseph, The Sub Inspector of Police, Arumanai Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

4. The Addl.Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.B.Brijesh Kishor, Advocate in SR.52095 Crl.O.P.(MD).No.17037 of 2016 12.09.2016 trp PBK/SK-SKN 27.09.2016 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/