Suresh Navaraj, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.17048 of 2016 SURESH NAVARAJ ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAZARETH POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT (CRIME No.242/2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.S.VAIGUNTH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as the sole accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.242 of 2016 on the file of the respondent Police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the de facto complainant are working in a school. Due to some dispute between them, the petitioner attacked the de facto complainant and caused simple injuries and also threatened him with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that injured person has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 12/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SATHANKULAM, TUTICORIN 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAZARETH POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.S.VAIGUNTH Advocate SR.No.51787 JAM/DB/SAR I/20.09.16/ 2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17048 of 2016 Date :12/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/