Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17108/2016disposed of

Thilakavathy v. The Commissioner Of Police,

2016-09-14Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD).No.17108 of 2016 Thilakavathy .. Petitioner Vs.

The State rep. By 1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Trichy City.

3.The Inspector of Police, Palakarai Police Station, Trichy.

.. Respondents (R3 suo motu impleaded as third respondent, as per the order of this Court in this petition) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 01.08.2016 and take necessary action against the proposed accused and within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 01.08.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the complaint preferred by the petitioner before the first

respondent has been transferred to the file of the Inspector of Police, Palakarai Police Station, Trichy for enquiry and that the petition enquiry is pending.

4.In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the Inspector of Police, Palakarai Police Station, Trichy, is suo motu impleaded as the third respondent in this petition and the third respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the third respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

5.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Trichy City.

3.The Inspector of Police, Palakarai Police Station, Trichy.

4.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to M/s.B.Jameel Arasu, Advocate SR.No.52316 Crl.O.P(MD)No.17108 of 2016 14.09.2016 am SD/SKS-RR/04.10.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/