S.Aandichi @ Ananthi, v. The Sub Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.17204 of 2016 1 S.AANDICHI @ ANANTHI, 2 S.NITHYA 3 CHINNAIAH 4 SINGARAM, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.1 to 4 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNAMARAVATHY POLICE STATION, IN CR. NO. 170 OF 2016 PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 4, prays for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.170 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have attacked the de-facto complainant and abused her in filthy language.

3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;

(b) In the event of appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukottai District, within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(i) petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to their satisfaction; (ii) petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(iii) petitioners 1 and 2 shall be available for interrogation by the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for two weeks and thereafter as and when required and the petitioners 3 and 4 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. sd/- 14/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNAMARAVATHY POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate SR.No.52109 JAM/SKS-RR/20.09.16/ 2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17204 of 2016 Date :14/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/