Shanmuganathan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03/06/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN

1. Shanmuganathan

2. Dhanalakshmi ... Petitioners/Accused No.1&2 Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Panayapatti Police Station, Pudhukottai District.

Crime no.172 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s M.Prabhu, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Anandharaj, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 172 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) of IPC r/w. Section 4 of TNPHW Act seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard both sides.

3. During the corona pandemic when the relief materials were distributed in Melapanayur Village there was a clash between the petitioners family and the defacto complainant, which has ended in registering the case against these petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that it is a case and case in counter. The injured persons were

discharged after treating for simple injury sustained.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured persons were discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukottai District on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. (c) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 03/06/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2. DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANAYAPATTI POLICE STATION, PUDHUKOTTAI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.M.PRABHU, Advocate ( SR-5753[I] dated 04/06/2020 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5481 of 2020 Date :03/06/2020 AAV SRS/ VR/ SAR-II/ 04.06.2020/ 3P/6C