← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4999/2021ordered

Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-08-27Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27/08/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI Murugan ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Theriruveli Police Station, Ramanathapuram District Crime No.22/2021. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : MR.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI, Advocate.

For Respondent : MR.T.SENTHILKUMAR, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.22 Of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 4(1)(aaa), 4(1)(i) of Tamilnadu Prohibition Act and Section 22(c) of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, in Crime No.22 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that when the petitioner was selling toddy milk, the respondent police arrested the petitioner and recovered 110 litters of toddy milk. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, but he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to file an undertaking affidavit before the respondent police as well as before the trial Court that he will not indulge in any other offences in future.

1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner is having four previous cases similar in nature and out of which, two cases have been disposed of.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner is ready to file an undertaking affidavit before the respondent police as well as before the trial Court that he will not indulge in any other offences in future, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Muthukulathur, Ramanathapuram District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused/ petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 27/08/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUTHUKULATHUR, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THERIRUVELI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to MR.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI, Advocate ( SR-5778[I] dated 27/08/2021 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4999 of 2021 Date :27/08/2021 IAS MK/PN/SAR.II/02.09.2021/3P/6C 3/3