Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/3946/2017ordered

V.Amalraj, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-04-18Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.3946 of 2017 1 V.AMALRAJ 2 N.RAMAMOORTHY ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.85 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT SUBRAMANI ... INTERVENER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.MUTHAMILRAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : M/S.A.S.SHANGEETHA, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, in crime No.85 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 506(i) of I.P.C. and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State and the learned counsel for the intervenor..

3.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant and the petitioners are friends and they were doing joint business and on that business, the petitioners borrowed money from the defacto complainant and he sent legal notice on 30.04.2015 to the petitioners and subsequently, filed the present complaint. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have nothing to do with the commission of offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

5.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent on instructions submitted the investigation is going on. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the matter has been arisen out of money dispute, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for five accused for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police concerned once in a week i.e. on every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 18/04/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI,MADURAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.V.MANIKANDAN, Advocate SR.No.20372

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3946 of 2017 Date :18/04/2017 ARUL CSL/KKR/SAR-IV/20.04.2017 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/