Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17381/2016ordered

Lakshmi v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-09-15Honourable Mr Justice C. T. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.17381 of 2016 1 LAKSHMI 2 RAJAMMAL @ RAJESHWARI 3 KUNAKATTHI @ VAIRAMUTHU ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 3 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUTHANGAL POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.445 OF 2016) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.KARUNANITHI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, prays for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 324 IPC r/w Section 4 of Prevention of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.445 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.

2. The case of the prosecution is that petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant and abused her in filthy language.

3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;

(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sivakasi within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, (i) petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to their satisfaction; (ii) petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(iii) 3rd petitioner shall be available for interrogation by the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for two weeks and thereafter as and when required and petitioners 1 and 2, being ladies, shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 15/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAKASI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3 THE ADLL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUTHANGAL POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.M.KARUNANITHI Advocate SR.No.52556 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17381 of 2016 Date :15/09/2016 PBK/DB/SAR-III 19/09/2016 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/