Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17387/2016ordered

Gurumoorthy @ Karthick v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-09-19Honourable Mr Justice B. Gokuldas2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.GOKULDAS CRL OP(MD) No.17387 of 2016 GURUMOORTHY @ KARTHICK ..PETITIONER/2nd ACCUSED Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLIES C.I.D, MADURAI.

(CRIME NO.207 OF 2016) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioner/accused, prays for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the offences punishable under Sections 6 (2)(3)(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, in Crime No.207 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that co accused has already been enlarged on bail.

4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that investigation is almost completed.

5.On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;

(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Madurai within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, (i) the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the likesum to their satisfaction;

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(ii)the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(iii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police as and when required.

sd/- 19/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, MADURAI.

2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MADURAI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLIES C.I.D, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate SR.No.53560 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17387 of 2016 Date :19/09/2016 PBK/AAL-MPA/SAR-III 21/09/2016 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/