Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7571/2018ordered

Muthuramalingam @ Kurangu v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-05-03Honourable Mrs Justice R. Tharani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Third day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL OP(MD) No.7571 of 2018 MUTHURAMALINGAM @ KURANGU MUTHURAMALINGAM ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVILANKULAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.13/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.M.ASOKAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused, in Crime No.13 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent/State. 3.The allegation against the petitioner is that on 20.03.2018 the petitioner attacked the complainant with beer bottle and caused injuries.

4.On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that only due to drunken mood, the alleged occurrence is stated to have been happened and the victim was already discharged from the hospital and hence, requested that the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail. 5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that already, a previous case is pending against the petitioner in Crime No.54 of 2006 and the offence involved in the previous case is 302 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

IPC and objected for granting of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Considering the fact that the offence mentioned in this case is not grievous in nature and the victim was already discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 03/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KAMUTHI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVILANKULAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.8124 VS JAM/07/05/2018/ CM-VR /GSR /2P-6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.7571 of 2018 Date :03/05/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/