← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17455/2016allowed

Saravanan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2016-09-19Honourable Mr Justice B. Gokuldas2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.GOKULDAS CRL OP(MD) No.17455 of 2016 SARAVANAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.3 Vs The State rep.by THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT (Crime.No.337 of 2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.SURESHKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 420 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No. 337 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused had not paid the full amount after registering the sale deed and when the same was questioned by the defacto complainant, he was threatened by the petitioner and others.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and he was falsely implicated in this case.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner/A3 being an agreement holder and also considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with the following condition. Accordingly, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) to the credit of Crime No.337 of 2016 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham and on receipt of the same, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10:30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

sd/- 19/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NATHAM 2 -do-thro THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.SURESHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.53569 sm:GSV-PM:SAR III:22/09/2016:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17455 of 2016 Date :19/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/