Nishanth v. The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Thirtieth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.GOKULDAS CRL OP(MD) No.17456 of 2016 NISHANTH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUVERAMBUR, TRICHY CITY (CRIME NO.01 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI,Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioner, who is arrayed as accused, prays for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 498(A) IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.1 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to demand of additional dowry, the de facto complainant preferred the present complaint against the petitioner and his family members. 3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side).
4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case.
5.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ investigation is almost over.
6.On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a)In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;
(b)In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy, within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, (i)petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to their satisfaction;
(ii)petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
(iii)petitioner shall report before the concerned Court daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.
sd/- 30/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.6 TRICHY 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUVERAMBUR, TRICHY CITY 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.T.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate SR.No.57432
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.17456 of 2016 Date :30/09/2016 nbj SH/SK-SKN/SAR-I:06.10.2016:2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/